In the latest video from Story of Stuff, narrator Annie Leonard uncovers the secret life of our electronics and exposes some startling information about the effects our cherished gadgets have on human health and the environment.
Ever wonder why our electronics seem to have a life span just short of two years? It all started back in the 1960s when semiconductor pioneer, Thomas Moore, predicted that "electronic designers [could] double processor speed every eighteen months." This novel idea became known as Moore's law and has since proven fairly accurate. Sadly, electronics companies have taken this to mean they can make their products shoddy, so people will buy more and more often. The result is a substantial increase in profits for them, but ample trouble for us.
One big reason is because "today's electronics routinely contain toxic chemicals like lead, mercury, PVC, chlorine, and bromines." During the 90s, Electronics giant IBM found themselves in a lot of trouble after the study they commissioned revealed that women who worked on computer chips in their Silicone Valley facilities suffered more miscarriages than women in the general populous. According to theSilicon Valley Toxics Coalition (SVTC) , IBM, among many others, have since taken "their manufatcoring to offshore places of lower environmental and labor protections." Mostly in countries like "Costa Rica, Mexico, China, Malaysia, Singapore and Scotland."
At the end of their short lives, most of our old televisions, computers and cell phones are sent to landfills; a mere 20 percent are recycled. However, in many cases, the outcome is just as dismal. As it turns out, about "50 to 80 percent of [recycled electronics are] shipped overseas to Asia and Africa where [they are] broken apart by workers to extract the small bits of valuable metals." The workers and their surroundings then
become exposed to all those chemicals mentioned earlier.
These problems are grave, but not unsolvable. There are plenty of things the average person can do at the grass roots level to initiate change in a more sustainable direction. For instance, we can hold manufacturers accountable for their electronic waste by supporting operations like the Take Back My TV campaign. Since 2007, this campaign has been encouraging "companies to offer free takeback and recycling programs…".
We can become better informed about recycling our old electronics by using a "recycler who is part of the e-Steward network; they don’t export to developing nations, and they follow other high standards."
We can do our best to promote good laws at the federal, state and local level. Like the "Producer responsibility bills [that] were passed in nine states plus New York City in 2008 alone"
We can make an effort to buy greener electronics by using The Center for Environmental Health'sGreen Purchasing Website . This nifty site "shows you what you can do to find green electronics at home, at work and at school."
And we could take personal action as well! Get involved by telling congress to "support HR 6252, which would make it illegal to send toxic e-waste from the U.S. to poor countries."
Every little change we can promote brings us a step closer to a truly eco-friendly future. We encourage everyone to help in any way they can.
We once again want to thank you for your input and criticisms. We here at Terraalert.com take our reader feedback very seriously. We strive to make our blog entries as accurate as possible. After reading your comments, we took it upon ourselves to revisit some of the claims you have brought up. However, after looking into the issue, we have decided that the concerns you have mentioned do not merit corrections, at least not until new data proves otherwise.
1) Lead Claim: "the cathode ray tubes (CRT's) in your discarded monitors contain traces of phosphorus, cadmium and 6-8 lbs of LEAD" http://www.city.waltham.ma.us/recycling/crtr%20recycling.html
"Cathode ray tubes (CRTs), including televisions and computer monitors, contain approximately 5 to 8 pounds of lead per unit." http://www.mcmua.com/hazardouswaste/FAQ_Electronics.htm
2) Shelf Life Claim: "According to a 1999 study by the National Safety Council, 20.6 million computer monitors became obsolete in 1998, and only 11% of those were recycled. NSC believes the lifespan of a personal computer has decreased from 4-5 years down to just two years, with nearly 500 million computers becoming obsolete between 1997 and 2006. NSC anticipates that three-quarters of all computers ever bought in the U.S. remain stockpiled in storerooms, attics, garages, and basements. Sweeping changes in technology, such as the anticipated conversion to digital broadcast television, shorten the useful lives of electronic devices and promise to increase the amount of electronics in waste."
As for the issue about "Take Back Programs" not being free, we find this is largely dependent on the particular company and products they provide. Some companies actually save quite a bit of money on take back programs.
Here is a list of companies with "Take Back Programs." Some of them have fees, incentives, free programs, and some are run by volunteers. The particulars of any one "Take back Program" are individual to the company that offers it. http://www.productstewardship.net/productsElectronicsBizProgramsTakeback.html Once again, we thank you for your comments and encourage your future participation on our blog.Quote
We here are Terraalert.com are very much aware that topics related to environmentalism and sustainability can be rife with misinformation. If any of our sources prove to be questionable or inaccurate, we would most certainly like to know about it.
We are greatly appreciative of any corrections our readers can offer to help make all of our information sound. We strive to make every one of our blog entries strongly backed by empirical evidence.
I would personally be very pleased if you could provide a few citations for the information you provided. I’m all too happy to make corrections where they are needed. Thank you, MyMelody ^_^Quote
0#2JohnAtl2010-11-15 17:33Third: when a company offers a "free" program, such as a free take-back program, you can believe that it is not free. The cost is rolled into the purchase price of the products they sell. Maybe you don't have to pay an obvious fee, but it is not free, you pay for it.
+1#1JohnAtl2010-11-15 17:21There seem to be some problems with the information in this video.
First: Old TVs have 5 pounds of lead in them? At most they might have one or two ounces of solder, which is mostly lead. There could also be a trace in the glass. Where are the other 4 pounds 14 ounces?
Second: Our electronics (by which you seem to mean anything with a CPU chip) does not have a life of less than two years; our standards do. The truth is thousands of computers relegated to the dump work just as well as the first day we installed DOS, Windows 3.1, etc. on them. So you can't really pin this one on the computer manufacturers. The blame might be more properly placed on software makers (Microsoft, et al.) for writing large, bloated, inefficient programs.Quote
Comments
We once again want to thank you for your input and criticisms. We here at Terraalert.com take our reader feedback very seriously. We strive to make our blog entries as accurate as possible. After reading your comments, we took it upon ourselves to revisit some of the claims you have brought up. However, after looking into the issue, we have decided that the concerns you have mentioned do not merit corrections, at least not until new data proves otherwise.
1) Lead Claim:
"the cathode ray tubes (CRT's) in your discarded monitors contain traces of phosphorus, cadmium and 6-8 lbs of LEAD"
http://www.city.waltham.ma.us/recycling/crtr%20recycling.html
"Cathode ray tubes (CRTs), including televisions and computer monitors, contain approximately 5 to 8 pounds of lead per unit."
http://www.mcmua.com/hazardouswaste/FAQ_Electronics.htm
2) Shelf Life Claim:
"According to a 1999 study by the National Safety Council, 20.6 million computer monitors became obsolete in 1998, and only 11% of those were recycled. NSC believes the lifespan of a personal computer has decreased from 4-5 years down to just two years, with nearly 500 million computers becoming obsolete between 1997 and 2006. NSC anticipates that three-quarters of all computers ever bought in the U.S. remain stockpiled in storerooms, attics, garages, and basements. Sweeping changes in technology, such as the anticipated conversion to digital broadcast television, shorten the useful lives of electronic devices and promise to increase the amount of electronics in waste."
http://www.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/topics/preventing-waste-and-pollution/product-stewardship/initiatives-in-minnesota/electronics/product-stewardship-initiative-for-electronics.html
As for the issue about "Take Back Programs" not being free, we find this is largely dependent on the particular company and products they provide. Some companies actually save quite a bit of money on take back programs.
http://books.google.com/books?id=2NJ9fWqXLdwC&pg=PA56&lpg=PA56&dq=take+back+programs+save+businesses+money&source=bl&ots=xPQWuhv5OD&sig=V04u0fBrKtolunkwGUO8-OzDPMc&hl=en&ei=LdHiTI2zH460sAOOlrRm&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CDYQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=take%20back%20programs%20save%20businesses%20money&f=false
Here is a list of companies with "Take Back Programs." Some of them have fees, incentives, free programs, and some are run by volunteers. The particulars of any one "Take back Program" are individual to the company that offers it.
http://www.productstewardship.net/productsElectronicsBizProgramsTakeback.html
Once again, we thank you for your comments and encourage your future participation on our blog. Quote
We here are Terraalert.com are very much aware that topics related to environmentalis m and sustainability can be rife with misinformation. If any of our sources prove to be questionable or inaccurate, we would most certainly like to know about it.
We are greatly appreciative of any corrections our readers can offer to help make all of our information sound. We strive to make every one of our blog entries strongly backed by empirical evidence.
I would personally be very pleased if you could provide a few citations for the information you provided. I’m all too happy to make corrections where they are needed.
Thank you, MyMelody ^_^ Quote
Fourth: computers are upgradable and repairable.
I look forward to your reply.
Regards,
John Quote
First: Old TVs have 5 pounds of lead in them? At most they might have one or two ounces of solder, which is mostly lead. There could also be a trace in the glass. Where are the other 4 pounds 14 ounces?
Second: Our electronics (by which you seem to mean anything with a CPU chip) does not have a life of less than two years; our standards do. The truth is thousands of computers relegated to the dump work just as well as the first day we installed DOS, Windows 3.1, etc. on them. So you can't really pin this one on the computer manufacturers. The blame might be more properly placed on software makers (Microsoft, et al.) for writing large, bloated, inefficient programs. Quote
RSS feed for comments to this post.